Loading the full read
First time here? Explain (top right) is on. Dotted words like edge, carry their meaning. Tap one for the rest. How to read a card →
Loading the full read
Bet Data Labs is a data and analytics service. We don't take bets. We help you understand yours.
Pts + Ast 11.5 · POR · Trail Blazers @ Lakers (home)
The card's line is Over 11.5; Over 9.5 is the line we would bet.
Tough matchup: Los Angeles allows 16.2 pts+ast to centers (7th fewest).
Every game behind L5, L10, L20 and H2H, drawn against tonight's line.
Recent role: 24.0 minutes, his last 10 games, leaving out 14 min (blowout).
Nothing moves it tonight: no fresh teammate absence, back-to-back, return or big spread.
He makes 4.8 pts + ast per 10 minutes over his last 10, so 11.5 needs about 24 minutes.
Over 11.5 by minutes, last 20 games: 7 of 14 in his normal 20 to 28 minutes, 2 of 5 over 28, 0 of 1 under 20.
| Line | Read | Last 10 | Price | Books | Add to slip |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5+ | SafeSafe | 10/10 | -2100 | 89% | |
| 10+ | Coin flipCoin flip | 6/10 | -236 | 66% | |
| 12+LINE | Coin flipCoin flip | 4/10 | -130 | 53% | |
| 15+ | Coin flipCoin flip | 2/10 | +171 | 35% | |
| 20+ | Coin flipCoin flip | 1/10 | +573 | 14% | |
| 25+ | Coin flipCoin flip | 0/10 | +1600 | 6% |
▲ Safe: he cleared it in 8 or more of his last 10, with room to spare, and the books agree. = Close call: he clears it, but too many games land right on the number. ▼ Coin flip: 6 of 10 or fewer, or the books make it 60% or less. The safe pick (SAFE) is the best-paying safe line. Books is how likely the books think it is once their margin is taken out.
The price's breakeven sits inside our range, so this one turns on exactly where the projection lands.
The band is our projection's standard error run through the same model that sets this card's win probability, so it shows how much the number could move if our read on the player's mean is off. The tick is what -130 has to beat to profit. We grade against that instead of a threshold we invented.
Only one book quotes both sides of this line, so fair value here is one book's opinion, not a market. Treat the edge as provisional.
Buy down to 9.5 at 1.42 (-236): win chance rises 60% to 71% and it still prices +EV (1.1%). Tightens the leg without giving up the edge.
| Line | Win | Push | Loss | Price | EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.5 | 89% | - | 11% | 1.05 (-2100) | -6.7% |
| 9.5tighten | 71% | - | 29% | 1.42 (-236) | +1.1% |
| 11push-safe | 60% | 6% | 34% | 1.57 (-176) fair | - |
| 11.5nowbest EV | 60% | - | 40% | 1.77 (-130) | +6.5% |
| 12 | 54% | 6% | 40% | 1.74 (-136) fair | - |
| 14.5 | 42% | - | 58% | 2.71 (+171) | (+14.8%) |
| 19.5 | 18% | - | 82% | 6.73 (+573) | (+21.8%) |
Win / push / loss come from our projected distribution. A whole-number line can push - an exact landing returns your stake - so buying to the whole number nearest our projection converts a slice of losses into stake-back. EV is shown only where a book actually quotes that line; other rungs show the model's fair price.
Best EV is the highest-value rung inside the trustworthy band. Tighten is the safest rung that stays +EV, for when a leg needs to survive rather than pay big. EV is our model's edge at the price a book actually quotes. Which rungs we trustis now de-vigged: we measure the book's margin on the two-sided main line (its vig-free read is 53% our side there) and strip that same margin off each one-sided rung. A losing-side rung is shown only when the book's own de-vigged price backs the model up, so a longshot can no longer post a phantom edge built on the model's fat tail. EV in (parentheses)is a rung where the model claims far more than the book's de-vigged number: indicative only, never a recommendation.
| Book | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| DK★ Best | 11.5 | -130 | -101 |
We only have one price for this so far. Movement shows up after our next check.
Prop weights: calibrated win probability 55 · market consensus 15 · price 15 · edge test 15 · kill signals -8 then -5 each. Clamped 0-100. Tiers: 90+ PRESS, 75-89 STRONG, 60-74 LEAN, 50-59 WATCH, <50 PASS.
Recent form is context, not signal. A team on a heater can still be the wrong side of the number. Cross-check with the projection above.
| Role | 2025-26 (77) | Final 3 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27.2 | 26.7 | = -0.5 |
| Shot share (FGA+FTA) | 10.0% | 9.5% | = -0.5 pts |
Shot share is his field-goal plus free-throw attempts over the team's, a usage proxy.
Last 5, 10 and 20 are his last games played, across seasons. L10 includes 8 games from 2025-26; L20 includes 18 from 2025-26.
Cells scored against the Over, the side this card is on. At 1.77 (-130) the price needs 57% to break even: green clears it with room, red falls short. A high hit rate at heavy juice is not an edge, which is why we grade against the price and not a round number.
The five most recent games played with a readable stat line, across seasons. Dimmed rows are outside the selected window, not excluded from the record. Hit and miss are scored against 11.5, this card's line, so the same game can be a hit here and a miss on a different rung. The price needs 57% to break even, which is the bar these percentages have to clear.